After being validated, a GraphQL query is executed by a GraphQL server which returns a result that mirrors the shape of the requested query, typically as JSON.
GraphQL cannot execute a query without a type system, let's use an example type system to illustrate executing a query. This is a part of the same type system used throughout the examples in these articles:
type Query { human(id: ID!): Human } type Human { name: String appearsIn: [Episode] starships: [Starship] } enum Episode { NEWHOPE EMPIRE JEDI } type Starship { name: String }
In order to describe what happens when a query is executed, let's use an example to walk through.
You can think of each field in a GraphQL query as a function or method of the previous type which returns the next type. In fact, this is exactly how GraphQL works. Each field on each type is backed by a function called the resolver which is provided by the GraphQL server developer. When a field is executed, the corresponding resolver is called to produce the next value.
If a field produces a scalar value like a string or number, then the execution completes. However if a field produces an object value then the query will contain another selection of fields which apply to that object. This continues until scalar values are reached. GraphQL queries always end at scalar values.
At the top level of every GraphQL server is a type that represents all of the possible entry points into the GraphQL API, it's often called the Root type or the Query type.
In this example, our Query type provides a field called human
which accepts the argument id
. The resolver function for this field likely accesses a database and then constructs and returns a Human
object.
Query: { human(obj, args, context) { return context.db.loadHumanByID(args.id).then( userData => new Human(userData) ) } }
This example is written in JavaScript, however GraphQL servers can be built in many different languages. A resolver function receives three arguments:
obj
The previous object, which for a field on the root Query type is often not used.args
The arguments provided to the field in the GraphQL query.context
A value which is provided to every resolver and holds important contextual information like the currently logged in user, or access to a database.Let's take a closer look at what's happening in this resolver function.
human(obj, args, context) { return context.db.loadHumanByID(args.id).then( userData => new Human(userData) ) }
The context
is used to provide access to a database which is used to load the data for a user by the id
provided as an argument in the GraphQL query. Since loading from a database is an asynchronous operation, this returns a Promise. In JavaScript Promises are used to work with asynchronous values, but the same concept exists in many languages, often called Futures, Tasks or Deferred. When the database returns, we can construct and return a new Human
object.
Notice that while the resolver function needs to be aware of Promises, the GraphQL query does not. It simply expects the human
field to return something which it can then ask the name
of. During execution, GraphQL will wait for Promises, Futures, and Tasks to complete before continuing and will do so with optimal concurrency.
Now that a Human
object is available, GraphQL execution can continue with the fields requested on it.
Human: { name(obj, args, context) { return obj.name } }
A GraphQL server is powered by a type system which is used to determine what to do next. Even before the human
field returns anything, GraphQL knows that the next step will be to resolve fields on the Human
type since the type system tells it that the human
field will return a Human
.
Resolving the name in this case is very straight-forward. The name resolver function is called and the obj
argument is the new Human
object returned from the previous field. In this case, we expect that Human object to have a name
property which we can read and return directly.
In fact, many GraphQL libraries will let you omit resolvers this simple and will just assume that if a resolver isn't provided for a field, that a property of the same name should be read and returned.
While the name
field is being resolved, the appearsIn
and starships
fields can be resolved concurrently. The appearsIn
field could also have a trivial resolver, but let's take a closer look:
Human: { appearsIn(obj) { return obj.appearsIn // returns [ 4, 5, 6 ] } }
Notice that our type system claims appearsIn
will return Enum values with known values, however this function is returning numbers! Indeed if we look up at the result we'll see that the appropriate Enum values are being returned. What's going on?
This is an example of scalar coercion. The type system knows what to expect and will convert the values returned by a resolver function into something that upholds the API contract. In this case, there may be an Enum defined on our server which uses numbers like 4
, 5
, and 6
internally, but represents them as Enum values in the GraphQL type system.
We've already seen a bit of what happens when a field returns a list of things with the appearsIn
field above. It returned a list of enum values, and since that's what the type system expected, each item in the list was coerced to the appropriate enum value. What happens when the starships
field is resolved?
Human: { starships(obj, args, context) { return obj.starshipIDs.map( id => context.db.loadStarshipByID(id).then( shipData => new Starship(shipData) ) ) } }
The resolver for this field is not just returning a Promise, it's returning a list of Promises. The Human
object had a list of ids of the Starships
they piloted, but we need to go load all of those ids to get real Starship objects.
GraphQL will wait for all of these Promises concurrently before continuing, and when left with a list of objects, it will concurrently continue yet again to load the name
field on each of these items.
As each field is resolved, the resulting value is placed into a key-value map with the field name (or alias) as the key and the resolved value as the value, this continues from the bottom leaf fields of the query all the way back up to the original field on the root Query type. Collectively these produce a structure that mirrors the original query which can then be sent (typically as JSON) to the client which requested it.
Let's take one last look at the original query to see how all these resolving functions produce a result: